Apotheosis Contelligence Increase Cosmic Frontier Hedonism & Fun Dreams & Psi Life Extension & Immortality Spaceship Earth
  Home      Forums      Library      Media      Gallery      Glossary      Links

July 29, 2004

The Self as Quantum Interface

Here's a starting point for some ideas about the Self that have been percolating in my skull for a while. This is a first pass at articulating some of these ideas...

What is the Self? The common understanding is that the Self is the psychological construct built up around the ego. It is the point of self-awareness, the image we have of our selves, and the surface on which we reflect the world around us. Trying to simply define the Self is difficult without using the word "self" - an example of it's recursive and slippery nature. We can say that it is the focus of I, or me. It is how we differentiate between the world of nature and the world behind our eyes. As a representation of biosurvival instincts bound up in the reptilian hind brain, the Self evaluates things & events and determines how they will affect us as individuals. In the human organism, instincts are abstracted up into the forebrain and bound to mental and emotional constructs. These abstractions into emotion, memory, and anticipation define the Self more completely but also make it more difficult to pin down. It is no longer simply the director of biosurvival but now ranges in the heights of cognition and the depths of psyche. All of our accumulated experiences contribute to our unique individual identity. From the Self we evaluate our past, direct the present and plan our futures.

But so far this examination of the Self neglects the true mystery and namelessness inherent within each of us. Yes, the Self is our uniqueness, our individuality, and the point of reflection, but what of the deeper, less tangible levels? It seems that as we drill further into the Self, it becomes less and less defined. The nearer we get to its root, the less we actually are as individuals. This is exhibited in the eastern meditative states of nirvana & satori where individual identity is sloughed off as the Self merges into the plenum of unity. At it's core, the Self seems contradictory to identity. Or rather, it becomes identified with something far greater and much smoother than the individual. It's like a raindrop falling into a pool of water. As it falls the drop is singular among many, distinguished from the other drops nearby. Striking the surface it is absorbed into the pool and its individuality as a drop is dissolved while simultaneously expanded to encompass the whole pool. Instead of reflecting the world from the outside of a small sphere, it reflects from the entire surface of the pool. As one delves deeper and deeper into the Self, more and more of creation is reflected on its surface.

Another way to look at the Self is as the initiator of free will. When you choose to move your arm across the table reaching for a glass of water, where does the initial impulse come from? This is the big stumper for neuroscience because we can only see the action potentials induced by the initiation, but there seems to be no recordable signature of the initiation itself. We can only measure the results of free will, not the impulse of will itself. The words I'm typing draw upon the contents of my memory, reflecting ideas and emotions, trying to converge on some greater meaning than just the sum of their parts. But what of the intangible inertia driving these threads of inquiry? What is the source of novel thought and ideation, the spark of creativity drawing something out of nothing? The Self, it seems, has its fingers in the quantum plenum, dipping its ladle into the stew of chaos to draw out the impulse of action.

If we accept the notion that the Self is a gradient moving between individual self-identity and unknowable unity, then we can examine the notion that it might be a direct link into the quantum plenum of probability. Our brains are, for all intents and purposes, finite. Our reductionist science has shown that thought and action are reflected in the firings of an innumerable array of neurons, differentiated and specialized to handle various tasks. This same science often suggests that the Self is an epiphenomenon of this vastly complex monkey brain. But the scales in which neurotransmitters function are nearing the quantum. The average vessicle of serotonin, for instance, is on the order of 400 angstroms across - a scale that begins to be affected by quantum uncertainty. Esteemed neurophysiologist John C. Eccles has noted that such a scale incurs an uncertainty of about 50 angstroms per millisecond. "It is therefore possible that the permitted range of behavior of a synaptic vessicle may be adequate to allow for the effective operation of the postulated 'mind influences' on the active cerebral cortex" (Eccles, 1970). In other words, free will may lie in the quantum uncertainty of neurotransmitters and their effects on neuronal firing. The brain is a malleable quantum device which may act as the conduit through which the Self creates. Whether the Self is an epiphenomenon of this quantum device or merely acts through it would seem irrelevant to this discussion. It is enough to say that there is a Self and it manifests within the quantum fields of neural networks.

Undeniably there is a Self and it does appear to exercise free will. Furthermore, the Self is creative and perfectly at ease drawing novelty out of a seemingly endless source of potential. So where is this endless source? It is the quantum plenum, the singular field of probability underlying all matter. It is the hologram of creation. All matter arises out of this field. At the subatomic level we understand that matter is formless, simply a dense soup of potential contained within a boundless point - a quantum wave function describing the probability of an event's occurrence. Heisenberg showed that observation is necessary to collapse the quantum wave function and cause possibility to undergo the formality of occurrence. The Self is clearly an observer capable of manifesting intent into reality, and it seems likely that it does so by tapping into the field of quantum probability.

The deepest function of the Self is, thus, as an interface with the quantum plenum. It is the locus of consciousness poised on the edge of the quantum wave function. Like Shiva, a blink of its eye can create and destroy worlds in an instant. Inversely, the Self might be likened to a valve through which the chaos of the Absolute flows into the mind, percolating through neural nets up into conscious awareness, modified by psyche and channeled through the human organism into action. Humans, it would seem, are indeed vehicles of god. Perhaps the margin between the Absolute and the Self is the residence of the Soul - the moment that divinity steps into matter, the wet grass of the Nile caught between the toes of Osiris...

If the Self is informed and driven by some link into quantum hyperspacetime, is it possible that hyperspace can be influenced by the Self? In other words, is it a two-way street? Clearly there seems to be some path of communication through such a portal. Telepathy, precognition, predictive dreams and psychic phenomena all seem to find explanation through quantum effects. The problem has traditionally been that neuroscience refuses to accept that quantum behavior can be extrapolated up into the classical realm. But clearly quantum effects go propagate upward otherwise there wouldn't be any matter at all. The complexities of a human brain could not exist without its quantum foundation. In our model thought itself is born out of the wave function and shaped by the higher levels of mind. Perhaps seemingly magickal, non-local events, influences, and communications between minds or between mind and matter might simply be a tunneling back out through the deep Self into the quantum plenum. Recent research has demonstrated non-local information exchange between paired particles. Mind is clearly capable of affecting brain chemistry on a very discrete level, so perhaps it can even encode spins for subatomic particles, given the appropriate conditions. At some point deep within the brain boundaries between Self and other dissolve into the field of quantum probability. When these boundaries fall, non-local effects could readily propagate throughout the entire universe.

Meditation, chanting, psychedelics, magickal techniques, and other methods can smooth out the gross self until the point of self reflection is at once non-existent and totally universal. In such states the interface between the individual and the universe nears identity, one mirroring the other. It is in such states when the barrier between the material plane of things and the subtle dimension of unity falls and information flows unhindered between the two. The creativity of the quantum plenum feeds the individual, and the energies of the individual feed the plenum. Like life and death, it is this flow, the oscillation between manifest and unmanifest, that pushes life ever forward into novel creations. The Absolute observes its Self through the eyes of creation. The human sense of self is a fragment of the universal Self, incarnate and bound within neural constructs. It is both the reason we've wandered from home and the path to return.

Posted by LVX23 at July 29, 2004 03:37 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence @ www.egodeath.com argues against the existence of free-will, among other things. Very interesting site...

Posted by: Duke Slaughter at July 29, 2004 05:22 PM

Duke, thanks for the link. Some very interestin gstuff indeed. It will take some time to dig through it all but this line grabbed me:

"Even if there is some true randomness in the world, the future remains predetermined, because of the illusory nature of the flow of time, and the inability to the ego-entity to be an ultimate origin of its own thoughts and choices."

This is a common element in a lot of the explorations of hypertime, or the ability to step out of the 4D timespace and look at history as a line extending from the past into the future. If time is indeed ultimately illusory, and it is theoretically possible to break the illusion, then the future would seem to be predetermined. I.E. you wouldn't be able to look at time as a linear path unless the line of history was already resolved into the future.

Grant Morrison's epic narrative The Invisibles explores some of these ideas. But for all intents and purposes predicting the future, much less viewing it or traveling to it, remains extremely challenging may only be possible within the arcane mathematics of quantum mechanics. While maths and philosophies can state that time is illusory and determinism rules, practical experience shows us that life remains very chaotic and unpredictable.

Posted by: lvx23 at July 29, 2004 06:46 PM

I would argue against this idea that there is no free-will and that the future is determined. This would make sense if there was only one quantum timeline, and our higher self was caught in that timeline. Why not the possibility that by tapping into our quantum higher self we essentially gain the freedom to choose our timelines, making thise choice ever moment?

I'm arguing that consciousness/free-will supercedes ALL of it.

Posted by: Paul Hughes at July 29, 2004 10:22 PM

It is entirely possible that time itself is multidimensional. The future is not one single line but many. Free will is a hopping between the lines of possible future time - collapsing the wave vector of infinite possibility into the moment of happening.

Posted by: lvx23 at July 29, 2004 11:48 PM

I found this fractal picture that represents how I think time looks if it is not a linear timeline.

Each dark spot represents a point of decision between alternate timelines, and each "line" itself a fractal of these decision points leading to a finer and finer granularity at each moment. The largest spots are major branching points in the course of evolution, I feel the spoken-of Singularity we may be approaching is one such point.

As for the quantum-indeterminate nature of self, Heisenberg's demonstration of the necessity of observation to collapse the quantum wave function is enlightening. If consciousness is modeled as a continuous/unified function (e.g. the net of Indra), then the collection of human brains through space-time becomes the medium of that consciousness becoming aware of itself through the process of self-observation. In this same vein, it is a medium for the Universe (multiverse?) to become aware of itself (themselves?).

Then in that fractal picture of time above, each decision-point becomes a point of self-observation and thus a point for the quantum wave function (that is the continuous yet multi-dimensional signal produced by Consciousness) to collapse into a particular reality. I think this has something to do with the signal resonating on fundamental harmonics (e.g. AUM).

Posted by: metachor at July 31, 2004 04:06 PM

I tend to agree with the notion that consciousness is necessary to reality (to collapse the wave function). But this notion implies that there is a field of consciousness that humans merely tap into. I mean, I human consciousness was necessary for anything to actually occur, then what about the fossil record? Obviously, there was a lot of time and creation before humans were even on the scene. It almost necesitates an Ur-intelligence or, dare I say it, a god.

Posted by: lvx23 at August 2, 2004 11:36 AM

LVX23, I think you might be mistaking complex cognitive self-reflective "human" consciousness for consciousness itself. I don't think it's something we tap into, rather it is consciousness that unfolds into "us" (i.e. all that is, is consciounses. This thing we call matter is merely part of consciousness unfolding.). From this perspective even a thermometer has consciousness, albiet very simplified. This point of view forms the basis for the philosopher David Chalmers work.

Posted by: Paul Hughes at August 2, 2004 11:04 PM

Not mistaken, just uncertain in this area. My writings on the self are really attempts to converge on my own personal understanding of consciousness. The universal field of consciousness is somewhat implicit in the notion of a higher, singular Self.

There's a great little book called The Starseed Transmissions, popularized by Tim Leary & RAW. It suggests an oscillatory model of consciousness, between the One and the individual. Before birth consciousness steps into the individual and takes on identity. At death it is withdrawn back into the plenum. I & I.

Posted by: lvx23 at August 2, 2004 11:29 PM

I'm hearing you. For me, talking about consciousness is the single most difficult subject to discuss, both from a semantic and conceptual standpoint.

Posted by: Paul Hughes at August 3, 2004 02:36 PM

I tip my hat to you for being able to verbally express these concepts, because I find these things very difficult to describe myself. However, I feel that it is due to our evolved/ing "need" to be able to be able to describe something in a simple two or three words could be part of the reason that other similar ideas in a number of studies (i.e. quantum theory) become difficult for us to grasp.

Posted by: whitey at August 18, 2004 07:00 PM